Re: Bug#696899: can anybody sponsor an ITP for premake4 ?
Since no one else here seems to be wondering, I'll just ask myself: Is
there any reason why the package is going to be renamed to "premake4",
i.e. appending the major version to the package name?
If this is going to get uploaded as "premake4", this is technically not
an adoption of "premake" but a NEW upload of "premake4".
If you really mean to adopt "premake", you should rename the package
from "premake4" to "premake" unless version 3 and 4 are fundamentally
different and it makes sense to keep both versions in the archive.
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - firstname.lastname@example.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - email@example.com
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913