Re: ri-li re-wrapped as commercial game by jalada GmbH
- To: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Cc: pkg-games-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, debian-devel-games <debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org>, Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Ronny Standtke <ronny.standtke@fhnw.ch>, Stephen Sweeney <stephen.j.sweeney@googlemail.com>
- Subject: Re: ri-li re-wrapped as commercial game by jalada GmbH
- From: Guus Sliepen <guus@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:16:57 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120418191657.GI30850@sliepen.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Guus Sliepen <guus@debian.org>, Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>, pkg-games-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, debian-devel-games <debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org>, Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Ronny Standtke <ronny.standtke@fhnw.ch>, Stephen Sweeney <stephen.j.sweeney@googlemail.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAKTje6FrmdSDH=0vxxvDsPeDjfVNudBArn6vCYOLf-ONCR02pA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <4F814239.4030007@gmx.net> <[🔎] 1334005456.3297.29.camel@mas> <[🔎] 20120409221542.GW30850@sliepen.org> <[🔎] 20120417215537.GH30850@sliepen.org> <[🔎] CAKTje6EH6-R87SVJW9TFe7sLo7_wO_NXSNpm+EW7C+z9bVnPuw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAKTje6FrmdSDH=0vxxvDsPeDjfVNudBArn6vCYOLf-ONCR02pA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 08:38:51AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > They are not violating the source code distribution terms but the GPL
> > has more terms than just that. AFAICT at least for Hex-a-Hop they are
> > violating item 6 of GPLv2 due to the restrictive EULA they apply to
> > the binaries.
The EULA I see does not place limitations on the binary, but rather on support
and the ability to get updates. It explicitly says: "Without limiting your
rights under the GPL, the Product and related documentation are subject to the
terms and conditions set forth in this EULA.", which I think means they say the
GPL prevails over any other conditions that might impose on it.
> It appears they are also linking against OpenSSL.
Indeed, it seems to be used by their launcher shell, to check the license key
and encrypt/decrypt some data. They should be able to port that to gcrypt
without problems.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <guus@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: