[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Should we have some NMU/commiting guidelines?



Hello pkg-gamers,

Commit access for all DDs have now been enabled for the pkg-games
repositories. Based on a brief discussion with Pabs on IRC, we figured
it would be nice to announce this to the debian-devel list or so, but
also noted that it's not really clear what things DDs are expected to
with the acces.

It might be relevant to have a set of team guidelines regarding how we
want our repositories to be used by non-maintainers of that particular
package.

I'm thinking that these guidelines should include both DDs and other
members of the pkg-games team.

The questions, as I see them, are:

Should DDs and pkg-games members who want to improve packages..

1. Contact maintainer before committing?

2. Commit freely, but let maintainer do the upload?

3. Commit and upload freely (though of course notify maintainer
appropriately)?

4. Also follow a per-repository "override"?
   - $ echo "Please notify maintainer before committing" > README.source

5. Only commit/upload freely in some cases, RC bugs for example?

Should different policies apply to DDs and pkg-games members?

Or, one could argue that it will always be a judgement call and
guidelines won't serve any purpose in most cases.

What do you think?
-- 
Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: