Am Sonntag, den 22.01.2012, 08:33 -0200 schrieb Sergio: > On 22/01/12 02:53, Rudy Godoy Guillén wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm the maintainer for Torcs. From what I've observed there were proposals to > > remove torcs in favor of SD. On one hand I've noticed SD development a bit > > stagnated[1] after the forking process. In the past I've been contacted by few > > people regarding the subject but to date there's no follow-up from their side. > > > > Currently Torcs development is active again[2], after a while, and they are > > including patches that I've forwarded in the past. I hold the position that > > eventually we should offer both and, if only if there's active development on > > SD and no development on Torcs I'd favor/help on the transition. > > > > 1- http://sourceforge.net/projects/speed-dreams/stats/scm?repo=SVNRepository > > 2- http://sourceforge.net/projects/torcs/stats/scm?repo=CVSRepository > > > > ps: I still have to move packaging bits to -games collab repo. So anyone > > interested on helping can just do so. > > > > > Hello, Rudy. > SD is being actively developed. But as you said, one game doesn't > exclude the other. > I have just suggested at > https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/speed-dreams/ticket/509 that if > someone from > the SD team will spend time deb packaging it then, from what I > understand, the effort should go towards > helping maintaining it for Debian. Hi! I also think, we should provide both. I have 1.4 packages of SD in git. But we should wait for 2.0.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part