[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Minutes: Debian Games Team meeting #6



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

The 6th Debian Games Team meeting was held on the 26th of November, at
10:00 (am) UTC.
See http://wiki.debian.org/Games/Meetings/2011-11-26

The summary is available at:
http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-games/2011/debian-games.2011-11-26-09.59.html
(action items are at the bottom)

And the full log is at:
http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-games/2011/debian-games.2011-11-26-09.59.log.html

Some highlights are:

* We decided to host a screenshotting Party, as described at
http://wiki.debian.org/Games/Parties/Screenshots
I will be the organizer for this, and I'm intending the check if it'd be
possible to hold it around December 11-13th, or 16-18th, poll and
preliminary announcement coming up...

* Team consensus on wanting to push SDL 1.3 for Wheezy, (Sam from SDL
team present)

* Next meeting (preliminary around 14th of Jan, -ish-maybe) will be
arranged by Ben Donald-Wilson (volunteered post-meeting, thanks! :)

- -- 
Martin Erik Werner ("arand") <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=/GzF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: