On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 22:00:43 -0700 Vincent Cheng <vincentc1208@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Karl Goetz <karl@kgoetz.id.au> wrote: > > > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 11:39:34 +0100 > > Philip Taylor <excors@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Vincent Cheng > > > <vincentc1208@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Karl Goetz <karl@kgoetz.id.au> > > > > wrote: > > > >> Not sure if all the CCs are required, so preserving them. > > > >> > > > >> [...] > > > >> Is there code distributed under the terms of > > > >> license_dbghelp.txt in this package? It would appear to be > > > >> non-dfsg compliant, so may cause you problems. > > > > > > > dbghelp is only used for Windows. > > > > I feel you still still be careful of the following: > > > > iii. Distribution Restrictions. You may not > > [...] > > * modify or distribute the source code of any Distributable Code > > so that any part of it becomes subject to an Excluded License. An > > Excluded License is one that requires, as a condition of use, > > modification or distribution, that > > * the code be disclosed or distributed in source code form; or > > * others have the right to modify it. > > > > It may cause you issues outside debian too. > > thanks, > > kk > Since dbghelp isn't needed for 0 A.D. on Linux, would it be > preferable if I simply strip the files affected by that license out > of the source package? I'm not sure; could someone else comment on this? thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature