Am Freitag, den 11.09.2009, 15:57 +0100 schrieb Jon Dowland: > Last year Barry posted a question about whether we were > going to stick with svn or move to git: > <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-games/2008/11/msg00010.html> > > What I would like to ask is, which of the two should we > *encourage* the use of. I would suggest git for new > packages. It would be good to standardise on *encouraging* > one (not demanding nor migrating to it) for the purposes of > our wiki documentation. I'm with you, except, that I would *really strongly* encourage git and have Subversion as very, very optional option ;) I think Subversion could be used by those who joined the team but are not familiar with a version control system, because I consider Subversion easier to learn and understand. But once familiar how things work, we should ask to switch over to git. That's simply my opinion. Cheers - Fuddl
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil