|
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:16:35 -0400 > From: bdefreese@debian.org > To: rombust@hotmail.co.uk > CC: debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Request for information to update existing libclanlib package > > Mark Page wrote: > > > > > > > Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:49:13 -0400 > > > From: bdefreese@debian.org > > > To: rombust@hotmail.co.uk > > > CC: debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org > > > Subject: Re: Request for information to update existing libclanlib > > package > > > > > > Mark Page wrote: > > > > <snip>> > > > > > > > > > > > > I did the last two updates, I'll take a look at at least upgrading > > > > to 1.0. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > That would be great. Use the subversion ClanLib V1 found at: > > > > svn://esoteric.clanlib.org/ClanLib/Development/ClanLib-1.0 > > > > > > > Mark, > > > > > > Do you know of any issues with clanlib from SVN? I am having the > > > following issue: > > > > > > /usr/bin/install: will not overwrite just-created > > > > > `/tmp/buildd/clanlib-1.0~svn3827/debian/tmp/usr/include/ClanLib-1.0/ClanLib/Core/System/log.h' > > > > > with `Core/System/log.h' > > > make[4]: *** [install-nobase_ClanLibincludeHEADERS] Error 1 > > > > > > I'm sure it's something stupid I'm doing but I'll be darned if I can > > > figure it out. > > > > > > > Yes, it was a mistake in the ClanLib SVN. > > > > "Sources/API/Makefile.am" contained a duplicate "Core/System/log.h " line > > > > Fixed in SVN. > > > > ( It has been like that since the SVN logs started in 2006 :) ) > > > Mark, > > Yeah I figured that out last night, thanks. I also discovered that the > Signals dir isn't in DIST_SUBDIRS in Sources/Makefile.am, so it doesn't > get cleaned up properly on make distclean. > > One other question, is there any reason that Examples/ uses a > Makefile.in instead of Makefile.am? > There is no reason that we (ClanLib developers) know why the Examples use Makefile.in instead of Makefile.am > Bye the way, we have some patches in Debian for adding some linking > options to many of the makefiles. Would someone be interested in > reviewing them? > > Thanks! > > Barry > Yes, that would be a great help. We could also apply them to ClanLib 2.0, for the next release. Either email myself the patch, provide a link to the patch or post it to clanlib's forum View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place - Learn more! |