Re: Rv: What license for our packaging?
- To: debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Rv: What license for our packaging?
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:17:02 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20080921181702.GK17977@ikibiki.org>
- In-reply-to: <4671dd0c0808251702ie130fcbwd40d548370861960@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <535622.36638.qm@web27206.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <e13a36b30808241642n497320acr1df96811fbbd192a@mail.gmail.com> <9bd2f8970808242124w6a80da34s9329d365da1a8bb0@mail.gmail.com> <48B29E06.9020307@gmail.com> <4671dd0c0808251702ie130fcbwd40d548370861960@mail.gmail.com>
Miriam Ruiz <miriam@debian.org> (26/08/2008):
> I'd prefer ISC or MIT. It's just a matter of words anyway:
OK, just call me ignorant if you like, but I never heard of ISC until
today. So let's go MIT if we're to choose one of those, don't you think?
Not that I don't want to get familiar with yet another license, but
please think of the kittens. :)
Mraw,
KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: