On 28/02/2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > Wait... I think there is a missunderstanding. 1.2.4.dfsg.1-1 got > allready uploaded. With all changes but yours. Woops, looks like I didn't check rmadison's output for this package. Yay at $SCM not providing an easy to check for tags… > Hmm... seems, that I forgot to add an empty changelog entry after > uploading it? Sorry. So the new package should be 1.2.4.dfsg.1-2 and > the changelog containing only your stuff (will take a look > tomorrow)... Depending on the time I've got before moving (a few hours), I might resplit the changelog entries, or continue working on other packages. > BTW: Is there a reason to patch 1.2.4 instead of upgrading to > 1.2.5, which seems to fix the issue, too? 1.2.5 is a totally new version to me, I'm just fixing gcc-4.3 FTBFS bugs, and I don't want to take the responsibility a package that I know nothing of, instead of only uploading an already-worked-on package to which I only add a tiny patch. Cheers, -- Cyril BRulebois
Attachment:
pgplcIZ5D4X7e.pgp
Description: PGP signature