Eddy Petrișor wrote: > More than that, if the -data depends on the binary, and the binary > depends back on the -data, we create a dependency cycle which should > never be allowed and I think there is a policy recommendation or even > must about cyclic deps. There is nothing wrong about dependency cycles, as long as you bear in mind that dpkg will break the cycle, and prefers to break it at a package in the cycle that has no postinst script, so that all postinsts run with their dependencies configured. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature