On Sat Dec 13 05:07, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > Fenix isn't in Etch. Dropping it from Lenny would remove a > > game, and a related framework (this seems to be the complete > > list): > > Unless we find a way to make it work in 64 bits, either we reduce the > arch to i386 only -which is something I don't like doing at all-, or > we remove it from Lenny. I'm not exactly sure that the code is of a > very high quality. It's a pity for pixfrogger, but maybe porting it to > python or C++ would be easier than to fix Fenix XD Well, restricting it to all the 32bit archs, presumably. I don't think that's necessarily a problem given it's not been released on other archs yet, so it's not a regression. I definitely think that at this point the options are 'drop completely' and 'drop from 64bit archs' and the latter is clearly preferable (of course if people think it's just generally bad, then dropping completely is reasonable) I assume this has been forwarded upstream? Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature