Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com> (23/08/2008): > Hello, Hello, first: Cc-ing ddg@ldo to get a possibly wider audience. > I propose that, from now on, we use the BSD license for our > packaging[2]. > > What do you think? I'm not against, since it's a pretty permissive license. I'm just used to using the same license as upstream's, so as to make sure patches etc. can be integrated w/o any second thought from upstream's POV. (Of course that doesn't apply to upstreams who have a license mess, but that's another story ;)) > [0] I 'borrowed' MadCoder's refresh-patches mechanism from the > tokyocabinet package (seen it in MadCoder's packaging with git > presentation). I checked the license terms/incompatibilities I saw > that packaging was BSD licensed (cool) I'm disconnected right now, but it might have been nice to point to the slides, just in case. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature