Hello debian-release,
I and Cyril Brulebois, as part of the DGT, made some changes to the
wormux package which mainly consist of the following:
Changes:
 wormux (1:0.8-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
 .
   [ Cyril Brulebois ]
   * debian/control.in:
      - Fix grammar in the short description of the wormux-data package.
   * debian/control:
      - Refresh accordingly.
   * debian/watch:
      - Use upstream version mangling to replace “beta” with “~beta”, which
        should help sorting new upstream beta versions correctly.
 .
   [ Eddy Petrișor ]
   * moved to git for maintenance and changed Vcs-* fields accordingly
   * imported the refresh-patches mechanism from tokyocabinet's package;
     thanks MadCoder
   * added simplepatchsys for patch management
   * Updated copyright information:
     - Added more of the upstream authors
     - cleared up debian/* license, thanks to all co-maintainers
   * imported some patches from upstream that fix important or RC bugs:
     - fix for a crash in the chat code when clearing the text
     - fix a segfault when the sound device wasn't available
     - do not load the index server needlessly with unaccessible games
   * update standards version to 3.8.0:
     - wrapped the Uploaders field
     - added debian/README.source, as recommended in debian-policy 4.14
The debdiff between the official 0.8-1 and the pending 0.8-2 is attached
(ignore 'UNRELEASED', it will be fixed).
Is such a change ok for upload and, if proven stable, migration to
lenny? If not, which part is unacceptable?