Hello debian-release,
I and Cyril Brulebois, as part of the DGT, made some changes to the
wormux package which mainly consist of the following:
Changes:
wormux (1:0.8-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
.
[ Cyril Brulebois ]
* debian/control.in:
- Fix grammar in the short description of the wormux-data package.
* debian/control:
- Refresh accordingly.
* debian/watch:
- Use upstream version mangling to replace “beta” with “~beta”, which
should help sorting new upstream beta versions correctly.
.
[ Eddy Petrișor ]
* moved to git for maintenance and changed Vcs-* fields accordingly
* imported the refresh-patches mechanism from tokyocabinet's package;
thanks MadCoder
* added simplepatchsys for patch management
* Updated copyright information:
- Added more of the upstream authors
- cleared up debian/* license, thanks to all co-maintainers
* imported some patches from upstream that fix important or RC bugs:
- fix for a crash in the chat code when clearing the text
- fix a segfault when the sound device wasn't available
- do not load the index server needlessly with unaccessible games
* update standards version to 3.8.0:
- wrapped the Uploaders field
- added debian/README.source, as recommended in debian-policy 4.14
The debdiff between the official 0.8-1 and the pending 0.8-2 is attached
(ignore 'UNRELEASED', it will be fixed).
Is such a change ok for upload and, if proven stable, migration to
lenny? If not, which part is unacceptable?