[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Doxygen Documentation from LGPL source under CC-BY-SA-2.5



Hello,

I know the CC-BY-SA-2.5 license is considered non-free. The api documentation 
in the ogre-doc package is under this license. Suppose upstream decided to 
use CC-BY-SA-3.0 instead. Would this still be allowed if the documentation is 
generated from LGPL source files?

-- 
Regards,
Andres

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: