On Sunday 18 May 2008 2:38:28 pm Simon Ruggier wrote: > On 5/18/08, Andres Mejia <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > openal-soft would change the soname to libopenal.1 instead of > > libopenal.0. Is testing for ABI-incompatibilities still necessary in such > > a case? > > No, though if there are no ABI incompatibilities, then the SONAME > should stay the same. If it was upstream that incremented the SONAME, > however, then it's safe to assume that the ABI has been broken. Ok. Yes, upstream did change the soname. -- Regards, Andres
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.