2007/8/23, Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda@deb.at>:
I don't see the real benefit (or, like you seem to do, need) of putting
the path of v3 into the copyright file too, because it might be
misguiding IMHO and isn't required, but I don't object to it. I just
want to make sure that we don't point _only_ to v3 in "v2 or later"
packages through using that symlink and not pointing to GPL-2 directly.
That's OK for me, we will provide 2 links then, one for the original version cited in the license, that's GPL-2, and another one for the latest GPL license, that's GPL
Is everybody OK with that?
Greetings,
Miry