Stefan Potyra wrote: > just noticed while forward porting trigger to new openal/alut, that=20 > libalut-dev doesn't depend on libopenal-dev. (alut's header includes openal= > 's=20 > headers). > > Any objections to fixing this in svn? No, this change sounds very reasonable to me. I currently cannot imagine any application which would need alut alone without openal. Greetings, Reinhard