[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Corriger dans woody ou pas?

>> "JM" == Jérôme Marant <jmarant@nerim.net> writes:

> Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> writes:


>> Et pour y uploader c'est simple, dans le changelog là où il y a marqué
>> "unstable" tu marques "woody-proposed-updates".

>   Oui mais ça ne me dit pas quels sont les critères pour l'acceptation
>   de mes paquets ...

Les mêmes que pour les mise à jour de la potato ?

C'est quand assez restrictif.

|  1. The package fixes a security problem.  An advisory by our own
|     Security Team would be quite helpful.  I really should make this a
|     requirement for security uploads.
|  2. The package fixes a critical bug which can lead into data loss,
|     data corruption, or an overly broken system, or the package is
|     broken or not usable (anymore).
|  3. The stable version of the package is not installable at all due to
|     broken or unmet dependencies or broken installation scripts.
|  4. All released architectures have to be in sync.
| Packages, which I will most probably reject:
|   . Package which fix non-critical bugs.
|   . Misplaced uploads, i.e. packages that were uploaded to 'stable
|     unstable' or `frozen unstable'.
|   . Packages for which its binary packages are out of sync with regard
|     to all supported architectures in the stable distribution.
|   . Binary packages for which the source got lost somehow.


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-french-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: