[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted cvprac 1.4.2+dfsg-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 07:27:36 +0200
Source: cvprac
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4.2+dfsg-1
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
Changes:
 cvprac (1.4.2+dfsg-1) sid; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fixing corrupted date in a previous changelog entry.
   * Updating watch file to version 5.
   * Removing rules-requires-root, not needed anymore.
   * Merging upstream version 1.4.2+dfsg.
Checksums-Sha1:
 fc9fa8ae17a6a1a9fa73512847330469700f14b4 1308 cvprac_1.4.2+dfsg-1.dsc
 eec866e60be5443f05280e0c244c89509540baac 390396 cvprac_1.4.2+dfsg.orig.tar.xz
 3177dfb31d27f8e739dba6dbfb616ac4f97df99d 2488 cvprac_1.4.2+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
 89a26f9b49dce27c9ee98fe282d9c3b62d062b1f 5783 cvprac_1.4.2+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 9dba1f634d4f6cb9cee0c75989b15ba6c3393e425c16171ee4739081c2958e09 1308 cvprac_1.4.2+dfsg-1.dsc
 2caa2067232d696800bd615537d2380cff379122c4cb319eae3f1242545e0c78 390396 cvprac_1.4.2+dfsg.orig.tar.xz
 444a0b9216b2b6f8868d1071e1b9e0e097e83d8edcd97b976d30925c80d3a007 2488 cvprac_1.4.2+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
 9e38d03c5457c6375252239067bdcff379eb6d482d50f456425fba282689a559 5783 cvprac_1.4.2+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 1a28ccf5d8312aae60a090754989f5d3 1308 python optional cvprac_1.4.2+dfsg-1.dsc
 ad5bb2a38c95d49d932290f42cc9cc06 390396 python optional cvprac_1.4.2+dfsg.orig.tar.xz
 96870f70d0fb5591d91df237a18ed75f 2488 python optional cvprac_1.4.2+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
 3bbbab53d80aca9c96fc5b8659415927 5783 python optional cvprac_1.4.2+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQmmGg4gLaoSj0ERgL7tPDoCoAiLwUCaPcaDAAKCRD7tPDoCoAi
L2nDAP4+KUf5RdOGzczFffUxzkXw22gclq7nuA0pqbTu2VTyPQEA2RX0fLcczn4Y
6UiS4SqlwZw0dCDIoqzqpO5dqXqpfAA=
=ajlq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpRNF0IPZUNt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: