[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted rust-lock-api 0.4.13-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 16:59:48 +0200
Source: rust-lock-api
Architecture: source
Version: 0.4.13-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Rust Maintainers <pkg-rust-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net>
Changed-By: Alexander Kjäll <alexander.kjall@gmail.com>
Changes:
 rust-lock-api (0.4.13-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Package lock_api 0.4.13 from crates.io using debcargo 2.7.10
Checksums-Sha1:
 7d16cae8564db21bfe01762e20fce1ee66e6ff0f 1767 rust-lock-api_0.4.13-1.dsc
 0e19ec1ac56963b995b0917fadfae2a44763449a 28565 rust-lock-api_0.4.13.orig.tar.gz
 6663e2e181974129a7b23e76df66497f1ed91986 3396 rust-lock-api_0.4.13-1.debian.tar.xz
 b84a76721ae87c9b2929ab571b6ad799cd90928f 6675 rust-lock-api_0.4.13-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 534a828987230b6bc324b1501d8989877f288b78df2a774d751a0df947877371 1767 rust-lock-api_0.4.13-1.dsc
 96936507f153605bddfcda068dd804796c84324ed2510809e5b2a624c81da765 28565 rust-lock-api_0.4.13.orig.tar.gz
 e1597764e09cf0e7663d71cb85911b99fcbc12ae149dab2291c15609a9000443 3396 rust-lock-api_0.4.13-1.debian.tar.xz
 df60d33f60d5b3db05df39b3e8a9fbe4f6905b23238e412be093f080d61fe24e 6675 rust-lock-api_0.4.13-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 d4b6ebe396fe9d3378ad8627b003bc1d 1767 rust optional rust-lock-api_0.4.13-1.dsc
 19a9faad553e60738ec21b0d36de26a1 28565 rust optional rust-lock-api_0.4.13.orig.tar.gz
 27d081aca812eefc1fcee1e39ebd7fbd 3396 rust optional rust-lock-api_0.4.13-1.debian.tar.xz
 4dda9ddab8d68a6e45860dc9e6ed24bb 6675 rust optional rust-lock-api_0.4.13-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQTjXSWUWAMcT4Fcz+oDR6wEe1CAhQUCaMQ1aAAKCRADR6wEe1CA
hfirAQCZVcpNRzTvr4fiFkH+wBKkgHkjh5v753O1H9QLqWoqtwD/QsEE0MumgLGw
Fu6HhFI34vxFuR4TPw/rm1IKaOfx7QY=
=vqnj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpDWoAKVMOXT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: