[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted progress-linux-metapackages 20221002-26 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 15:31:35 +0200
Source: progress-linux-metapackages
Architecture: source
Version: 20221002-26
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
Changes:
 progress-linux-metapackages (20221002-26) sid; urgency=medium
 .
   * Adding gnome-shell-extension-manager to progress-linux-gnome-desktop
     depends.
   * Adding gnome-shell-extension-no-annoyance to progress-linux-gnome-
     desktop depends.
Checksums-Sha1:
 5d030786d5b18237879b0c45068131d2888c4ea3 2167 progress-linux-metapackages_20221002-26.dsc
 ed52930009044a2d5f91fdf073db6735713938d7 8544 progress-linux-metapackages_20221002-26.debian.tar.xz
 1d83fd846bf4d2292cfe45070d39ac65277de806 7968 progress-linux-metapackages_20221002-26_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 73e350a92f0bff6bf8061a7ee3ab7f0257c0169b7cfce664c9236cd7e60786e7 2167 progress-linux-metapackages_20221002-26.dsc
 bf25a34235f161ac438d4929a0e2a53b0584f186c0d20b01bc78faf35ed5654a 8544 progress-linux-metapackages_20221002-26.debian.tar.xz
 83f210c5b468acee1addb89959af1e3a88c31c75dbf5f8808876a9043e7ce17c 7968 progress-linux-metapackages_20221002-26_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 5d3fa682c6a345b2871e5e848fd788b4 2167 metapackages optional progress-linux-metapackages_20221002-26.dsc
 0e50a8ccdfc875e4e6c1a41d422d2552 8544 metapackages optional progress-linux-metapackages_20221002-26.debian.tar.xz
 78a8a2b920a83464d05ad246dc96f57a 7968 metapackages optional progress-linux-metapackages_20221002-26_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQmmGg4gLaoSj0ERgL7tPDoCoAiLwUCaIjSOgAKCRD7tPDoCoAi
L5/eAQDCTSQFhz7FBxofUFMWPLq36xawQGmYTVP47WFoNUTOQwD7BsxXzRyNvNJK
8GEbV5RtNpSksOSJytYls8ytDzBUGAE=
=6idr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpJuBSFZgj97.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: