[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted systemd-boot-efi-amd64-signed 257.4+6 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 23:33:26 +0000
Source: systemd-boot-efi-amd64-signed
Architecture: source
Version: 257.4+6
Distribution: sid
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian systemd Maintainers <pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Changes:
 systemd-boot-efi-amd64-signed (257.4+6) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Sign EFI binaries from systemd-boot-efi 257.4-6
 .
   * systemd: conflict with dracut on arm64. Same as the systemd-
     nspawn/arm64 changes of 257.4-4. As correctly pointed out on the
     reopened #1079329 this combination also creates incompatibilities, so
     add an explicit package conflict to fix this occurrence too as
     requested by the reporter. (Closes: #1079329)
   * d/control: fix systemd-boot and systemd-boot-tools descriptions
   * Add Lintian override for 'unknown-field Protected'
Checksums-Sha1:
 5e33c576ac574b36dd11cb82d77f5662ae3c972c 1783 systemd-boot-efi-amd64-signed_257.4+6.dsc
 72809a56bdfa38c943646fb4d7c94685fc58ac5a 3728 systemd-boot-efi-amd64-signed_257.4+6.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 7c670195b5f5cfb5fd07866043cd77803ec9a56dd482895a15bcea7122281ffd 1783 systemd-boot-efi-amd64-signed_257.4+6.dsc
 7c994b933c552a0676000878903471b54fd9b78480cbee57e815169812ac9d0c 3728 systemd-boot-efi-amd64-signed_257.4+6.tar.xz
Files:
 37a99f0aed484af47dee66ff656e4ce0 1783 admin optional systemd-boot-efi-amd64-signed_257.4+6.dsc
 17493d206e1c6e7ba03612a710c5e7ad 3728 admin optional systemd-boot-efi-amd64-signed_257.4+6.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfKFfvHEI+gkU+E+di0FRiLdONzYFAmfnoh4ACgkQi0FRiLdO
NzY9rw//VAFHpWd+lK4dzu/mwmTjp4FPDneKVJyXU/QiOf3WtNP05LZbH1vKnl6W
vhTJF6FCMIkUWCI6s4SMWjc5PSe5jCambxKW1eIuGzz83vLk5YsTYq66ZVIJ9WxR
DHe2qVfFFGpA3hrncOmzU3wnb3xR53HzlaXUDuOfC6+gGC4S3YQN0gOeUlYtLX4R
xx8nRAoOLseTzgAzjYvaDPrurBOQfCpWR7L/0O4+wEfu3Li9aLghPcwoAtkoQQY1
1qPwl4e60JfBL62/zI2Hqt4mylmDYyYDbzRPf6Z2+gNtVsEvIDk56Ip7cEz+jLzj
4/tOjeTQramcJAzc3gGhWYja2Btv7+Bv/jHiZ+TZe07bSiFWs9WoPT+73yQnNsNr
5C8iCsKKxqpxXdKtecgqzqHSE6vcVUbOJJHkI+CFXoCCdbYr/tTkYdEsTFKD+4TH
/UW1FskuH0DkQ1BiPdYnvqw3eC0pGV4SrfOXYHdYz2V5op1k2B/jo+sdiSmsfCnw
z4+3y56DHBXV4fSuoIPMbVnWkzSOkNMlEmmaH+dhRT0GQQRWX16qB8m++YySpfYj
UfhdkNdPR6Rtl/Fzm2yDy7nfaX0Z3TLrIM1q7W2pSJCyO0/WDhSSEUZ5h8GLwWet
DdD1p9hwu7t71r6JNZZswJddJjkUxEhrv9v5Rs2K+FB2oFnpOUY=
=p3KA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgp49mYsjdbYa.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: