[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted systemd-boot-efi-arm64-signed 257.4+6 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 23:33:26 +0000
Source: systemd-boot-efi-arm64-signed
Architecture: source
Version: 257.4+6
Distribution: sid
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian systemd Maintainers <pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Changes:
 systemd-boot-efi-arm64-signed (257.4+6) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Sign EFI binaries from systemd-boot-efi 257.4-6
 .
   * systemd: conflict with dracut on arm64. Same as the systemd-
     nspawn/arm64 changes of 257.4-4. As correctly pointed out on the
     reopened #1079329 this combination also creates incompatibilities, so
     add an explicit package conflict to fix this occurrence too as
     requested by the reporter. (Closes: #1079329)
   * d/control: fix systemd-boot and systemd-boot-tools descriptions
   * Add Lintian override for 'unknown-field Protected'
Checksums-Sha1:
 16886b5b7a603133c9ad1a403f59ada92ff4de9b 1783 systemd-boot-efi-arm64-signed_257.4+6.dsc
 44bcc5a9d5817b5d7eae5a8eb8f66640e4678213 3732 systemd-boot-efi-arm64-signed_257.4+6.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 f2903eaea93957e5599a4486939c0a13abc3b14ce7b29d6334b9f6a5a4ef7498 1783 systemd-boot-efi-arm64-signed_257.4+6.dsc
 b889a24637490829a04811ea14faf87815228eab67b1b7eb79877f98e880c3c1 3732 systemd-boot-efi-arm64-signed_257.4+6.tar.xz
Files:
 09b8d093280aa2bd1d7e598882d37999 1783 admin optional systemd-boot-efi-arm64-signed_257.4+6.dsc
 cdfd717071f7c6b375dc73694f870471 3732 admin optional systemd-boot-efi-arm64-signed_257.4+6.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Vew4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpYU52lTOaQf.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: