[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted libloc 0.9.18-2 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 08:55:35 +0100
Source: libloc
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.18-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: libloc maintainers <team+libloc@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@eds.org>
Changes:
 libloc (0.9.18-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Valters Jansons ]
   * Update symbols for 0.9.18
   * address: Fix endianess problem when fetching octets in IPv4 addresses
 .
   [ Hans-Christoph Steiner ]
   * add new binary package: lua-location
Checksums-Sha1:
 7e0ea1c779d515bb13f19f9e06ebdb3df3aa776c 2333 libloc_0.9.18-2.dsc
 80cbd43a747b8aa7c3cace4a247821bcb94946b0 11196 libloc_0.9.18-2.debian.tar.xz
 4d65668b674e155831af439023a877f62e4aa330 8887 libloc_0.9.18-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 8bd74e402a6e89f73518c2bd81796147a48bd3f2f2754e36f5012dbaa0df2bbe 2333 libloc_0.9.18-2.dsc
 8fda3133db64de0a771d132384394dfb3fcf523f14da98d8588037016a932d45 11196 libloc_0.9.18-2.debian.tar.xz
 31b43b2f51e0a1d8016057e0d762a9c730c4a4591634444d8a0cb00aaae9c467 8887 libloc_0.9.18-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 faac0cd9047d90f654cd2268048ca02c 2333 net optional libloc_0.9.18-2.dsc
 8015c39e8c074a2237d09dcbb6b0ec7b 11196 net optional libloc_0.9.18-2.debian.tar.xz
 aa6fa2f1e79570a969a50f9994f65626 8887 net optional libloc_0.9.18-2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEElyI52+aGmfUmwGoFPhd4F7obm/oFAmfmVlwACgkQPhd4F7ob
m/pBqwgAndK4roim2uulRUrvJCGnuhYYVFHmgsLP/RCHa4UqyFqK+NNxX2wZdfVJ
+gytWF0Xk0amsdAsz/sBN6/IOT9XbJSUoPdPvWhuy2B3H2krCuphlIEpR52zFzNz
R+xgfvXNOa64q3vUlVa5plg2yg6JIAtKtw4ff+VCK6eznsYVHZcA/m6FOEeUCr0h
YtpOVwlTQbvzvWCgKsVuao0WHoEgl2xJ6qegBDkKLkx0GRRICzddreXeYUFyBxt6
pnAUNjZ7C935LuDTw3lSpOfVgsu2O6+J3926n9rFFfTn8piX4isTYITFwiAolS4D
ZJ7tMwhtdzHFzF0C3YPlb13jv0AEZg==
=TEQE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpZSG2sqlo7b.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: