[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted rust-gufo-jpeg 0.2.0-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 18:19:13 +0100
Source: rust-gufo-jpeg
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Rust Maintainers <pkg-rust-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net>
Changed-By: Matthias Geiger <werdahias@debian.org>
Changes:
 rust-gufo-jpeg (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Package gufo-jpeg 0.2.0 from crates.io using debcargo 2.7.7
   * Stop marking tests as broken
Checksums-Sha1:
 d668350875ac293ad826043f0e6c1b49e4adfa5a 1741 rust-gufo-jpeg_0.2.0-1.dsc
 ca1a33cae43fb0a1d1769c9d37581caa8f35bc59 23017 rust-gufo-jpeg_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 fe214ea5a24b37c9ef5b17ac8264a936e48d2461 2384 rust-gufo-jpeg_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 245724c2a0552029e792667ad70ac4141b865167 6758 rust-gufo-jpeg_0.2.0-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 df6440338b176c2b2a90098ff25526767ac77d1c6b2c931415447db3a8c4dd2a 1741 rust-gufo-jpeg_0.2.0-1.dsc
 047379e4825d1a8581f0bf0daa841d71eff1503229bcdef004ad1d18e17b39f0 23017 rust-gufo-jpeg_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 b5890db55d3411d1e89e0c92871d72e76670571cd39346206e386cc19848a219 2384 rust-gufo-jpeg_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 0593cf84e33104e5e4ecf584ad6d2d17d3136840df1dca48802b13d420f55b3f 6758 rust-gufo-jpeg_0.2.0-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 c18fca416697faf42b9ee5e04e3e532c 1741 rust optional rust-gufo-jpeg_0.2.0-1.dsc
 ce5fc34a6152e663c8e614834231e22d 23017 rust optional rust-gufo-jpeg_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 b0f3899ac93b949a43f44e2667373ade 2384 rust optional rust-gufo-jpeg_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 a00769aa1313453283bf2362ec58a9fc 6758 rust optional rust-gufo-jpeg_0.2.0-1_source.buildinfo


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQUWTv/Sl6/b+DpcW7svtu2B7myvgUCZ8XkkwAKCRDsvtu2B7my
vjDxAP0c542c4PdAKg7yV/ujgdAFP555hHo/FJnjVkbPgdW/fQEAvJAKrp7IeESK
8MpvW29N6gdlOA3ZZInnILiQhV3NEgg=
=OMab
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpuvh5LGwzlK.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: