[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted dh-ros 0.13.10 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 00:18:42 +0200
Source: dh-ros
Architecture: source
Version: 0.13.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Robotics Team <team+robotics@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org>
Changes:
 dh-ros (0.13.10) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Make develspace dir name less ugly
   * Do not add CATKIN_DEVEL_PREFIX to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH
   * Override dh_auto_test for catkin packages
Checksums-Sha1:
 0957eaab6f741db8ded856076ceac8f6b86bad85 2106 dh-ros_0.13.10.dsc
 622c8b65194889f1c688b34df4bf9726c722e793 14300 dh-ros_0.13.10.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 d1f171187660ef22c1238b15c1f813050371ba61b9531cc9b07e3246c7cbd729 2106 dh-ros_0.13.10.dsc
 91603e9a7a3175cc1251934335ec4146530cccb6152a8de4bd8923f06e4194a2 14300 dh-ros_0.13.10.tar.xz
Files:
 ae740ea55c7f311835b1f6b7d5c98e9f 2106 devel optional dh-ros_0.13.10.dsc
 f04ad83e3d407187a87fec956256e13a 14300 devel optional dh-ros_0.13.10.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=pwOi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpkX3jfjp7OV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: