[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted electric-fence 2.2.7 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 16:52:57 +0100
Source: electric-fence
Architecture: source
Version: 2.2.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org>
Changed-By: Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org>
Closes: 1074933
Changes:
 electric-fence (2.2.7) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix errors reported by gcc-14 (Closes: #1074933)
   * Update a lintian override
Checksums-Sha1:
 93309ef71bf688cb56b3162d926c87a164b2d015 1578 electric-fence_2.2.7.dsc
 7b6af7c7e6247a80afc7018677c23300a0fd9b06 30961 electric-fence_2.2.7.tar.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 34c979e752d176ced1b5faf1b3a4d8907d534bba36b413d52cc311c4d7ccbe46 1578 electric-fence_2.2.7.dsc
 9544dd4212ed1c34dc6de06c83324e1a8dc866a1949b8c69b7ba5bedcea373aa 30961 electric-fence_2.2.7.tar.gz
Files:
 c3e6309c8598e0d735ef38ebfc5f9eac 1578 devel optional electric-fence_2.2.7.dsc
 611d9f7fb35202ad7ea6a35e66cfd5e9 30961 devel optional electric-fence_2.2.7.tar.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ptr7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgptMiacjQ8P3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: