[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted dkim-rotate 1.1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 01:32:47 +0000
Source: dkim-rotate
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Changed-By: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Closes: 1064452
Changes:
 dkim-rotate (1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   Important bugfix:
   * Fix reload failure handling with multiple reload-neededs.
     Closes: #1064452.  [Report from Daniel Gröber]
 .
   Documentation etc.:
   * Correct spelling mistakes in docs etc.  [MR !1 from Edward Betts]
   * example.zone: Clarify commented directive.  [Report from Daniel Gröber]
   * dkim-rotate(5): Add a SEE ALSO referencing the example config.
   * debian/control: Improve description.
 .
   Tests:
   * tests: Test spurious "corrupted state" bug #1064452.
Checksums-Sha1:
 67ff90ec795de3b7d54837b7f4d1e8ca3796d09d 1327 dkim-rotate_1.1.dsc
 5a6e7e5f84b620ea41e701116232698f9609aac5 25220 dkim-rotate_1.1.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 15d0a4f73a4878ba000b232f1692a35373ef787b55acc2d7cd1a5e0d3197f4b5 1327 dkim-rotate_1.1.dsc
 8e2be2aa1270644588bc7e5454beb998345d8903e1607316105f51370d0b62d0 25220 dkim-rotate_1.1.tar.xz
Files:
 7f3523f339a8d4756c219da58be9c323 1327 mail optional dkim-rotate_1.1.dsc
 7ffee823a8431f3dce7e15419bb82387 25220 mail optional dkim-rotate_1.1.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEVZrkbC1rbTJl58uh4+M5I0i1DTkFAmXaolcACgkQ4+M5I0i1
DTnftAf+J2af+FPufzkhtdMvNa/TCFeUF4WHrd7sK2bO5Vpf4tHM2T62ZSo5Vf82
EPaC0HSEvp5tl5w+33abZD5x3a3xpJd+4mIf75zYf5d0XPyJmkkwhMKUQ/UwT1yg
yxXxfLw7Nn+Wbo16yoO2P/MliAlks/YlG0zERGTJJDWLwfehHeLT6+WvhDlUu5mO
lwPKsyaVuhnC7FXskecMAGG/9Ff6zxhVhhNy6f3dO+ZkcisKl2XFPYviTWDrsQLU
mEJI9cpf7ufbuT6WjJrw8ZZ9pFEx05/i6AJNcM7vMIj/txnpfhDpQ1EmcAr+ZV5T
Qc4fApHYaHmef7NuLW8Rrkme3jNnQA==
=q+Yk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpq7ib7yS6DL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: