[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted armnn 20.08-11 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 10:21:27 +0100
Source: armnn
Architecture: source
Version: 20.08-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Francis Murtagh <francis.murtagh@arm.com>
Changed-By: Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org>
Closes: 998043 1010217 1030216
Changes:
 armnn (20.08-11) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Urgency high due to 2 RC bugfixes.
   * Remove -DARMCOMPUTENEON=1 from the build options on armhf. Not all armhf
     systems have NEON support (Closes: #998043)
   * Add fix-gcc12-ftbfs.patch to fix building with gcc 12 (Closes: #1030216)
   * python3-pyarmnn: recommend libarmnn-cpuref-backend22 (Closes: #1010217)
   * Fix the lintian warning for "superfluous-file-pattern
     third-party/tensorflow/schema.fbs" by dropping the entry from
     debian/copyright. There is no such file.
   * Set Standards-Version to 4.6.2.
   * Add myself to uploaders with Wookey's permission.
Checksums-Sha1:
 372b0b07d768b6262b89092da1e379509ea91966 3209 armnn_20.08-11.dsc
 7844cf983255de4b24c84ea04a71aade8a1922f9 19888 armnn_20.08-11.debian.tar.xz
 89af402d76a61f34dd2920adc936063f28c5f991 14340 armnn_20.08-11_arm64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 c922c73de2f751cff88b4be47f875ff0ab8434336ba923e6a0ea8e94599cce80 3209 armnn_20.08-11.dsc
 7935c6d49ab8abf4ee378873707de5ca819bbf330f29b7a1383437fa72435196 19888 armnn_20.08-11.debian.tar.xz
 3bc42f35f6ade1bbb08de7d929fc82cda2515bc3668adfa86da599d2b0ca7920 14340 armnn_20.08-11_arm64.buildinfo
Files:
 03473c96c3a8e172981d626ebee813aa 3209 devel optional armnn_20.08-11.dsc
 f912af857f931ec37ec1cb37bbffe3cd 19888 devel optional armnn_20.08-11.debian.tar.xz
 6d0d97cced6ade8f3e531973f3c4e9f3 14340 devel optional armnn_20.08-11_arm64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=y5Lc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: