Accepted pam 1.5.2-9.1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 19:38:53 +0200
Source: pam
Architecture: source
Version: 1.5.2-9.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
Changed-By: Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>
Closes: 1054505
Changes:
pam (1.5.2-9.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload acked by Sam Hartman.
* Really fix quilt-related FTBFS: (Closes: #1054505)
pam is a 3.0 (quilt) source package and has a .pc directory after unpack
despite having no debian/patches. Even when setting QUILT_PATCH_DIR or
QUILT_PATCHES, quilt is now mislead to using the non-existent
debian/patches and this makes dh_quilt_unpatch fail, so we delete that
directory unless it corresponds to the real debian/patches-applied that we
want to be used.
Checksums-Sha1:
70bd5c0dd622b9bd0954a89038384db057a1a408 2502 pam_1.5.2-9.1.dsc
29450ded9e4ba66dbc99e7bded3df9af44ffc15a 130160 pam_1.5.2-9.1.debian.tar.xz
a33c8dd8a0280d1da95712c73d202767982b3c47 8691 pam_1.5.2-9.1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
d4b7fa6507e266e715b5d8474ef251d18478e5b69f494f41bbcc49122e4ca42b 2502 pam_1.5.2-9.1.dsc
075dbb4cc5b9cd3260861e9e1f65db17f934ff5c02c574a9fdfe0cb334c2f1b5 130160 pam_1.5.2-9.1.debian.tar.xz
65bf3d393cd43d408f33e4fe726eb8b7fdd8a815f426c5ea5ae361cd9d36a763 8691 pam_1.5.2-9.1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
af345e3900e2d43ba6492818640f3456 2502 libs optional pam_1.5.2-9.1.dsc
3d3a21f3c977527af44bb035e7489ecc 130160 libs optional pam_1.5.2-9.1.debian.tar.xz
7b86e1f0ed8296db005123d6b490e266 8691 libs optional pam_1.5.2-9.1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=+tGR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: