[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted nvme-stas 2.3-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 10:25:45 +0200
Source: nvme-stas
Architecture: source
Version: 2.3-1
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Changes:
 nvme-stas (2.3-1) sid; urgency=medium
 .
   * Uploading to sid.
   * Merging upstream version 2.3.
   * Including debian version 2.2.2-2.
   * Removing Fix-byte-ordering-in-iputil-operations.patch, not needed with
     upstream version 2.3.
Checksums-Sha1:
 3380799423616ce97d06ccce81f0f29eb151c6fc 2251 nvme-stas_2.3-1.dsc
 5072f956deaf929b692fc65994b2a601ff1fa66f 320300 nvme-stas_2.3.orig.tar.xz
 bad4371a6acefa1e4d305fd1e7baddab436d9915 2952 nvme-stas_2.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 6e8489daadf4b256ee97a4d58ab1dcca3b7db101 7679 nvme-stas_2.3-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 2e72d013bebc271e1165772bcd68b214403f25e9da34afde170b34fe7ba7cddb 2251 nvme-stas_2.3-1.dsc
 d31a201a3f7ad2c1540b9d51d1662aa0e1e9df235949bdd568f3e2caa39d97f2 320300 nvme-stas_2.3.orig.tar.xz
 861cdee78352f56b993fab5752e6d89bf5b84b88a620ba1815fafd54ea231730 2952 nvme-stas_2.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 b7439b670d4aab4b847cf123ad77e79cf6ae4bd4e4bf8cf6a5a13c2f4ea1b624 7679 nvme-stas_2.3-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 4c8ee19601b9ce3c59455789b43c4244 2251 net optional nvme-stas_2.3-1.dsc
 e63c9fb6bceb2f35e43fc7b450526f8d 320300 net optional nvme-stas_2.3.orig.tar.xz
 80da7e0dd92e31f155bb1e8a3ddc6df5 2952 net optional nvme-stas_2.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 f761399d5c59a53b9cf4bbb93bb9e320 7679 net optional nvme-stas_2.3-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=qPWQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: