Accepted qemu 1:8.1.0+ds-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2023 22:37:02 +0300
Source: qemu
Architecture: source
Version: 1:8.1.0+ds-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QEMU Team <pkg-qemu-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Changes:
qemu (1:8.1.0+ds-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* d/control: fix descriptions of qemu-system-gui and
qemu-system-modules-spice packages
* update lintian-overrides
* d/rules: enable verbose (-v) build for qboot
* d/rules: move lto control to where it actually works
* d/rules: remove usage of "standard dh sequencer".
It has mutliple issues. To name a few:
- it exports CFLAGS &Co which breaks badly when trying to compile
bios/firmware code (fixes FTBFS with new -fcf-protection)
- it performs multiple recursive calls to d/rules which is
slow when make variables are set using $(shell), - annoying
when debugging
- it hides actual actions being done at install/binary stages
- it is confusing in override_dh_foo{,-indep,-arch}
- it does just too much unknown magic, - just give the control
back.
Checksums-Sha1:
becb95be33c75db71710b78c25067fcdb4db151e 8109 qemu_8.1.0+ds-2.dsc
bde645c277ba0bb7ea470014183996d065ca4250 133576 qemu_8.1.0+ds-2.debian.tar.xz
f25d3664f31070234952bfc5fcdcb038816854ec 13932 qemu_8.1.0+ds-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
553c09d3771f0ac15e9d5f7af72e9aeea50b613ef04ee5be4c300213a4ecc613 8109 qemu_8.1.0+ds-2.dsc
452d6294a6ca43518d1de13d32c6447980cd9d7bc13d8067065a8839b0fb092a 133576 qemu_8.1.0+ds-2.debian.tar.xz
05b95718082ffa66786076e4b0e51d924ac8bc4017599b8618e8975dacc3255b 13932 qemu_8.1.0+ds-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
b78a3785b6b161eb8f33ccf21334b064 8109 otherosfs optional qemu_8.1.0+ds-2.dsc
fb2233769859984f3725249ef3eca91c 133576 otherosfs optional qemu_8.1.0+ds-2.debian.tar.xz
b6709e4c87a2570e49890fc4f09e8fe8 13932 otherosfs optional qemu_8.1.0+ds-2_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQFDBAEBCgAtFiEEe3O61ovnosKJMUsicBtPaxppPlkFAmT8yyQPHG1qdEB0bHMu
bXNrLnJ1AAoJEHAbT2saaT5Zj/IIAMZ9CgskpNmUTfnytzp0OgSi8HT2QFJUXrfO
wz/rWA0WoPyhfU8LvcPchFDSdCVg9zIkAfQ3Ha3FzYlwtrh53TXtIKIxmgj7Yws6
36kUc95ChhFOezjMgG2NndWgtD6HioRhQOyvEdmBr0Tnp3e2lPaIDo2DsRB40XKH
DIytqdZT8ah6v9p4AAbMsHL5fGpT0XMgbz96dqrQ6XhbkprDW76iIIKjoW7vGTQ0
G67FV+PCqyooDTM3o9EmhxCpb6ofECr9IICvYwvHGi/LMZ3010LQT3hCZDm/AsLd
i9YClc4nLULGWiVAZpXgaZDhYARnqso+YjT2OctGfF40GWYAC2w=
=BQjO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: