Accepted gcr4 4.1.0-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:46:42 -0400
Source: gcr4
Built-For-Profiles: noudeb
Architecture: source
Version: 4.1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers <pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@ubuntu.com>
Closes: 1023632
Changes:
gcr4 (4.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Release to unstable
.
gcr4 (4.1.0-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Rename source package for new series since we'll need to keep the
old series around for a while
* New upstream release (Closes: #1023632)
* Build with gtk4
* Update binary package names & symbols files
* Create a minimal gcr4 package that depends on the old gcr:
we can keep using the old gcr binary package for now
* debian/rules: Drop obsolete build option
* debian/tests/control: Drop the gcr4 test until it can be rewritten
Checksums-Sha1:
4fd29213a3f69761a85d3173c68d747e81c48630 3019 gcr4_4.1.0-2.dsc
d2d74550be0d00109ffa9a0f1e0f71fd6f1b079a 21520 gcr4_4.1.0-2.debian.tar.xz
da0f52b04e7cc186b6f856269f54cecef8a304cf 18999 gcr4_4.1.0-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
d0ae3123c04bf77ffccc89cb36e65c1de4c1031de7be074780868c4ad3822afb 3019 gcr4_4.1.0-2.dsc
cba51555dac3ee0b55aa29b3804d18f87c34dc9ee090b11230705b10923bfeac 21520 gcr4_4.1.0-2.debian.tar.xz
bec86bbdae4cb1ff754e5518da3621185fe5feb4f0784ff4cec8b8106e715ac3 18999 gcr4_4.1.0-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
89974f7e5acdd93536b67499ed3bd227 3019 gnome optional gcr4_4.1.0-2.dsc
12a3deaddaa93d455d3b7bd6ec17c49e 21520 gnome optional gcr4_4.1.0-2.debian.tar.xz
af47064a8361e4c11dd9ccf83ca42acc 18999 gnome optional gcr4_4.1.0-2_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEETQvhLw5HdtiqzpaW5mx3Wuv+bH0FAmQTgG4ACgkQ5mx3Wuv+
bH0Rbw/8CFdBZALnVeNLARHFPsXNllIj3M/l3z1jebaI9gtP6Fio8qskoO9LKK2h
l5XsWvo/qQD0IymKD2VRLdmTt+v4DYgyWNqS+GH+MwikkpnchbPxO3i+lvdMZz7t
nWFYT0Ww7o8ySYdpxeqC1FbqqlrscBaENmSB6taacZiO1wql46myKefdJh7oC7yK
xuovuEpXj5MrtmM+Ua0ozNgtLYtCHrLglTmlce9Fw6jLug0M34gjHL/0oTysC//d
GAw3W4o4YIyVUOT/YdVTPLUy4SJFfMQN2Agva+gbetgKc8nlAAqk9lq3Nkn/72Ns
o0uKljRs24THulYjI8fvegS0yi+7BXP4vLjwk3VfXNktmrhrRyObNV8pqIX3vS3o
IrvDyOJm134a/1q1/BjQOJJC3hYEqNSeVPCPy5HbpnW4T10KuKARnJ3dEwJwIlod
zacPzDa3eV+wLtwgUaYLaLrbbgFtt5YHRxgXXFodmOUlVTYgwxXZCCEgNjIf3CcZ
Y6E4alvyaSISPbPHPQ3XjV6XotdmUXK6P+Bdsrw4GGYkUmzfNTLPdq4wB8zwme9k
aqCXKvfNWTgc1dSvPCWhyxn5Y16ci2Y07+n6+3/9I4RhiaXgeaMsmQ4QGHvjAg+X
RIH3emLYnkFI7UrgD5pyfDnDPw5Ss/dYDPoBu+R4Y13u588JRFA=
=Won+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: