[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted pytorch 1.13.1+dfsg-4 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:21:37 -0400
Source: pytorch
Architecture: source
Version: 1.13.1+dfsg-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Deep Learning Team <debian-ai@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org>
Changes:
 pytorch (1.13.1+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Aron Xu ]
   * Disable CI on salsa, unable to complete a build
 .
   [ Mo Zhou ]
   * Switch back to Generic BLAS against correctly build against it.
     We have update-alternatives for the BLAS/LAPACK backends.
     https://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/LinearAlgebraLibraries
   * Only in this way can both Numpy and Torch consistently load the
     same BLAS implementation, lest bad things such as threading library
     collision happen.
Checksums-Sha1:
 b0302605913a5097d00f449f222dcf0ca9f4304e 3388 pytorch_1.13.1+dfsg-4.dsc
 313697cb302b3f48bd6ea8f31da95e1d4d016ef4 193756 pytorch_1.13.1+dfsg-4.debian.tar.xz
 2664e6f7446788c9bc439170d41a8cfaf15df1fe 8589 pytorch_1.13.1+dfsg-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 0c8c5dc52df6a728a8d00d87b5c042ec9a6b96a8ce4d58ab9de44b307b4402de 3388 pytorch_1.13.1+dfsg-4.dsc
 b0b4b35b25901dc303005ab42e58f2c634e7ca978a667fdc819bc058165bd112 193756 pytorch_1.13.1+dfsg-4.debian.tar.xz
 c9088336acb44862f541090188a4583383999d1416ccc42c77eb21d5c84f7dee 8589 pytorch_1.13.1+dfsg-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
 b922c0920364abd0ff69f60b4ffc851d 3388 science optional pytorch_1.13.1+dfsg-4.dsc
 4afe1e7cae01969f9d9c83bb63c83907 193756 science optional pytorch_1.13.1+dfsg-4.debian.tar.xz
 622b58908eb46dac3414a576aac272d5 8589 science optional pytorch_1.13.1+dfsg-4_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=0nOM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: