Accepted tardiff 0.1-7 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 15:18:11 +0200
Source: tardiff
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>
Changed-By: Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>
Changes:
tardiff (0.1-7) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Revamp package description to be more precise and more verbose.
* Mention diffoscope as the "big hammer" alternative in the package
description and add a Suggests on "diffoscope-minimal | diffoscope".
* Remove no more needed lintian override for "no-upstream-changelog".
* Bump packaging copyright years in debian/copyright. Thanks Lintian!
* Bump debian/watch version to 4. (But the watch file is a no-op. :-)
* Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.1. (No changes needed.)
* Bump debhelper-compat level to 13.
Checksums-Sha1:
47fa75fa0a5cebb33b13195a72b5528d5c8f7fb7 1788 tardiff_0.1-7.dsc
4633dd098673887e9ba70f76b6509997d08c0c23 5584 tardiff_0.1-7.debian.tar.xz
2851b4e27da956e86aa5c8bb46ea0ec183adeb12 6307 tardiff_0.1-7_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
25a4da799493543f569216655c12a4d521ca814ed65931e555b8fcd461bfa087 1788 tardiff_0.1-7.dsc
306d41b43eca47c3eb2bdbb4a62973a18356f9d6c1be4a298c4f8e38e065cf9d 5584 tardiff_0.1-7.debian.tar.xz
2bb1a36c5eadd294613779b042d66fc997d7d3f84bc9d02a1af952754ec5e03b 6307 tardiff_0.1-7_source.buildinfo
Files:
660991303501c00c8a3c78608b746eae 1788 utils optional tardiff_0.1-7.dsc
d35d7025e8e4d00833d2bb7989315dd4 5584 utils optional tardiff_0.1-7.debian.tar.xz
f075abac4611512e7428246766d165e8 6307 utils optional tardiff_0.1-7_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=H92i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: