[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gprconfig-kb 22.0.0-3 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 09:45:54 +0000
Source: gprconfig-kb
Architecture: source
Version: 22.0.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Nicolas Boulenguez <nicolas@debian.org>
Changed-By: Nicolas Boulenguez <nicolas@debian.org>
Changes:
 gprconfig-kb (22.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * gprconfig.patch: patch library partial linker in the right line.
     Symptom: gprlib can’t call /usr/bin/gcc (or selects a wrong version).
Checksums-Sha1:
 21b124ab58a9ae47bf910c1a6213a94223502a50 1881 gprconfig-kb_22.0.0-3.dsc
 5dd4b9cb688843fd761bbe7cf1747abf8d8f7c0c 6168 gprconfig-kb_22.0.0-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 6349038cf0b0bbde2aa148a8a299a6d68f4e2f450800c8a3789d64782feb2f3d 1881 gprconfig-kb_22.0.0-3.dsc
 45bf671aee20e72ea1037e10317256e6bc4fd076f9745c6f43232da5275ed3df 6168 gprconfig-kb_22.0.0-3.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 40a853869265277bac52c94a8f06e226 1881 devel optional gprconfig-kb_22.0.0-3.dsc
 784166aa493ef6a89cd35568c2aa0d61 6168 devel optional gprconfig-kb_22.0.0-3.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=eVar
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: