Accepted openjdk-17 17.0.2+8-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:13:47 +0100
Source: openjdk-17
Architecture: source
Version: 17.0.2+8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk-17@packages.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
Changes:
openjdk-17 (17.0.2+8-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* OpenJDK 17.0.2+8 (release).
* Addresses security issues: CVE-2022-21366, CVE-2022-21365, CVE-2022-21360,
CVE-2022-21341, CVE-2022-21340, CVE-2022-21305, CVE-2022-21299,
CVE-2022-21296, CVE-2022-21294, CVE-2022-21293, CVE-2022-21291,
CVE-2022-21283, CVE-2022-21282, CVE-2022-21277, CVE-2022-21248.
Checksums-Sha1:
7fa2c6fa350a11395825888f66d1605bf2bd11ab 4243 openjdk-17_17.0.2+8-1.dsc
a614cb0e057e94c694ff95d2f560d30f74829d08 63582232 openjdk-17_17.0.2+8.orig.tar.xz
b3bc4c76b7e5cec669208fadb971d13562672265 198344 openjdk-17_17.0.2+8-1.debian.tar.xz
d17dce1642af0082cb76d89b2b8929be9850df9a 11874 openjdk-17_17.0.2+8-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
419f0d4c310ca5aa9b5d5cec79af28224c0bde98ef99f3c33774a83c6855e55b 4243 openjdk-17_17.0.2+8-1.dsc
f1b5ac6670131cff83e2b15e54dca153487672ffeb3479c5db8a1544c12593a0 63582232 openjdk-17_17.0.2+8.orig.tar.xz
9ba1b7582f54a8136a50fab24870a6941bc3f999535f28fde997a73e7866c0fa 198344 openjdk-17_17.0.2+8-1.debian.tar.xz
b8af04af64d289620a3d43f04e05d535b8d13f4313f22fc3207998fb62d1f6ac 11874 openjdk-17_17.0.2+8-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
28c8ce94c019c16e894d65ac5d2971e2 4243 java optional openjdk-17_17.0.2+8-1.dsc
e26285346747baff49ce643699b12d3d 63582232 java optional openjdk-17_17.0.2+8.orig.tar.xz
0c2c3541285ba6caf2e4cdb8334a3c2f 198344 java optional openjdk-17_17.0.2+8-1.debian.tar.xz
cfe8dae54e3dffedb58c2acbdfc1b63d 11874 java optional openjdk-17_17.0.2+8-1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=0Jp8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: