[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted rpki-client 8.2-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:05:51 +0100
Source: rpki-client
Architecture: source
Version: 8.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>
Changed-By: Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>
Changes:
 rpki-client (8.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
Checksums-Sha1:
 15ce495e852937216395d4be1a7b388d5a4a2673 1506 rpki-client_8.2-1.dsc
 239e8a58b3c2074145dfd2b60c87f68b57bc10df 475141 rpki-client_8.2.orig.tar.gz
 3a07b46eff27958c8d6f2803ff6370c230453ed3 833 rpki-client_8.2.orig.tar.gz.asc
 1aa6467c8e05af62f8561d8d485adc93da40f413 6260 rpki-client_8.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 b06f2869696ebaa6885511acaebf2a87fcca2e17 5924 rpki-client_8.2-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 c88b4923835a96e5270978b8949863a25ca652540d728d9bec20bf4a06d32e2a 1506 rpki-client_8.2-1.dsc
 dc0d19679b57ae657b92d21730b1678823974d43300faa8c24ee155c1e2b1d64 475141 rpki-client_8.2.orig.tar.gz
 d6760e1c03ab7c527f6138c72fe150855d8d081f67fbdc23252c6191e8c797c7 833 rpki-client_8.2.orig.tar.gz.asc
 bd3bd2e33948514f0c29be7e53cc1d57f44872a9f7f42680201538c26d84c236 6260 rpki-client_8.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 041cf732bd7744f58c1cb9471190333f9c17bda75a0f2a82fbc9b1c8eb988d71 5924 rpki-client_8.2-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 7d1452b417f42ca4981c824ea7315f06 1506 net optional rpki-client_8.2-1.dsc
 7a6f718bc8cbd7a3771d85a2d4826aad 475141 net optional rpki-client_8.2.orig.tar.gz
 a62da22ea2f7a494e00c76e1879ab7b3 833 net optional rpki-client_8.2.orig.tar.gz.asc
 f30964f685a608786bf7205a30c86ae6 6260 net optional rpki-client_8.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 04c4ae23930905f2c93d1efc056cd8e5 5924 net optional rpki-client_8.2-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYIAB0WIQQnKUXNg20437dCfobLPsM64d7XgQUCY5nmzQAKCRDLPsM64d7X
gRivAQDhvOZ1fKANKc96WlGNIbQIYZiGWcRQslGjny6fwAZqVAD9Hu+0Yk5DCkXn
rXsoZIuNS28MXhw/EFTwWDtGpY1SMAA=
=+PPy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: