Accepted libloc-database 0~20221029-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 18:51:02 +0200
Source: libloc-database
Architecture: source
Version: 0~20221029-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: libloc maintainers <team+libloc@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org>
Changes:
libloc-database (0~20221029-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Debian Janitor ]
* Trim trailing whitespace.
.
[ Jochen Sprickerhof ]
* New upstream version 0~20221029
Checksums-Sha1:
1a1502bce9ed29c4da00caafcf9afdabc59852a8 2432 libloc-database_0~20221029-1.dsc
3970f1bc0eed035bce4de309cc129e2987805c9b 5254716 libloc-database_0~20221029.orig.tar.xz
7d3795fe7fcfca2d567a96187250e6d9e1ae8132 7348 libloc-database_0~20221029-1.debian.tar.xz
7e6ad1b168f29decd061a54644001be6cebf7a9f 6231 libloc-database_0~20221029-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
6ba0329e7d20fe0965fe90470bba5cebe546c576cf027ca56a2270e419ec8589 2432 libloc-database_0~20221029-1.dsc
b1648d7056e36e15ecbabe907f8d815c8334c59a14792ee2009959b3a92857a1 5254716 libloc-database_0~20221029.orig.tar.xz
570d2b8f4fc6181227d89330fcbf4e3fcf1b38c737bd4be26d062693198f8780 7348 libloc-database_0~20221029-1.debian.tar.xz
9d0975239aeef7a0665f23e10eb087624927bab87d35cd9a13ca57fc746a516e 6231 libloc-database_0~20221029-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
a68240599cb0aa1ed6fc6ade437dfb06 2432 net optional libloc-database_0~20221029-1.dsc
85f6cbf02c3a699ea518271576fe20ab 5254716 net optional libloc-database_0~20221029.orig.tar.xz
6fcb7a935642c85c60ad2cbd5ef2f945 7348 net optional libloc-database_0~20221029-1.debian.tar.xz
3ccaa7f1e03a6ccf155ec881040583e3 6231 net optional libloc-database_0~20221029-1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=xgjJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: