Accepted createrepo-c 0.17.3-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 16:28:57 +0300
Source: createrepo-c
Architecture: source
Version: 0.17.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Peter Pentchev <roam@debian.org>
Changed-By: Peter Pentchev <roam@debian.org>
Closes: 1018332
Changes:
createrepo-c (0.17.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.0 with no changes.
* Use debhelper compat 14 for the CMake fixes and add LD_LIBRARY_PATH
to the build-time test's environment.
* New upstream release:
- uses pkg-config instead of the custom CMake "find a library" files
- uses Python's unittest module instead of nose to run the tests, so
drop the nosetests3 patch; Closes: #1018332
- refresh the python-path patch
- add python3-setuptools and python3-skbuild as build-time dependencies
- add the python-skbuild-path and python-platlib-debian patches
* Add the year 2022 to my debian/* copyright notice.
* Declare compliance with Policy 4.6.1 with no changes.
* Also drop python3-nose as a dependency for libcreaterepo-c-dev.
Checksums-Sha1:
a8b4fa7d5a64e034c33860115bac7871f7120384 2534 createrepo-c_0.17.3-1.dsc
e65f98775f99365afc75fc4a4a5f75827186071e 592214 createrepo-c_0.17.3.orig.tar.gz
b57e32cc7cf9536bdd1b5eaf38d445be358af794 9100 createrepo-c_0.17.3-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
54a0a65da93cebfddf398b9e2c07053f0e6bae54bafad34fe4da0af9fffd09a6 2534 createrepo-c_0.17.3-1.dsc
e3fafdddcb4c58d45c48ca03f18998c4020fa0598a54093c24cd748fd308cb98 592214 createrepo-c_0.17.3.orig.tar.gz
35308037486eecafd365585096f0946f73ad91fc3079bc987bd3c93eca084b06 9100 createrepo-c_0.17.3-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
0fb4a265317c0ce266c813e3d5f016c4 2534 utils optional createrepo-c_0.17.3-1.dsc
30f459fb1deb89f078ffe05f14c53710 592214 utils optional createrepo-c_0.17.3.orig.tar.gz
3585f45bace0f811e68a683215786dfb 9100 utils optional createrepo-c_0.17.3-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=ZfMc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: