[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted ruby-fcgi 0.9.2.1-3 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:13:12 +0100
Source: ruby-fcgi
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.2.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
Changes:
 ruby-fcgi (0.9.2.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Cédric Boutillier ]
   * Use https:// in Vcs-* fields
   * Use https:// in Vcs-* fields
 .
   [ Utkarsh Gupta ]
   * Add salsa-ci.yml
 .
   [ Debian Janitor ]
   * Trim trailing whitespace.
   * Use secure copyright file specification URI.
   * Use secure URI in Homepage field.
   * Bump debhelper from old 9 to 12.
   * Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
   * Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Database, Bug-Submit, Repository,
     Repository-Browse.
   * Update Vcs-* headers from URL redirect.
   * Use canonical URL in Vcs-Git.
Checksums-Sha1:
 3a6e4d51b8cc8772c0658c193b1d471a314a3092 1965 ruby-fcgi_0.9.2.1-3.dsc
 d76b7bdca62b3e7f9116d16061f0c6c55e91a8fc 3228 ruby-fcgi_0.9.2.1-3.debian.tar.xz
 9f9c22427e32e6c59de9f5921fe86dca96bc84b4 9553 ruby-fcgi_0.9.2.1-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 fe5575a8e3d1969f7b9afc22f3c39852ea8ed8c07f59b00822608561f74000a2 1965 ruby-fcgi_0.9.2.1-3.dsc
 852fca81eb89177dd25c9fce845cd728f88dd2cbcdf2ffb2ef79a471cff4c275 3228 ruby-fcgi_0.9.2.1-3.debian.tar.xz
 961b9618a4bc6ed1e91d4026f894f3bb861074de835b68961ad326e203d0cd75 9553 ruby-fcgi_0.9.2.1-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 d9347be59da9763cc1123e8a33e9ff22 1965 ruby optional ruby-fcgi_0.9.2.1-3.dsc
 e718419f0bbe54176ef4720dd69c88ad 3228 ruby optional ruby-fcgi_0.9.2.1-3.debian.tar.xz
 78df8d5cf0fe790a2857ab1a3eb3969a 9553 ruby optional ruby-fcgi_0.9.2.1-3_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=u+HD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: