Accepted gcc-or1k-elf 1.0.2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 18:31:44 +0200
Source: gcc-or1k-elf
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Nicolas Boulenguez <nicolas@debian.org>
Changed-By: Nicolas Boulenguez <nicolas@debian.org>
Changes:
gcc-or1k-elf (1.0.2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Remove unused breakout-link lintian override
* Really fix permissions for liblto_plugin.so
* tests: avoid a duplication of the GNU type
* Standards-Version: no change update
* copyright: update years, add contributors
* rules: allow empty gcc/patches/git-updates.diff
* Build with GCC-12
Checksums-Sha1:
d1c8ceeb01f4cd20762863b4edf44ac554bf65c8 1749 gcc-or1k-elf_1.0.2.dsc
7e4dcc9f786d43e804707d8d01c981aec6c3050f 4748 gcc-or1k-elf_1.0.2.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
33a2851b797101f519e8c084ea197c109a43dc22d367394adf165124abc3d04e 1749 gcc-or1k-elf_1.0.2.dsc
e6be247773b0ee3ae8ccad4c34da981d34a3dcc7fb479832ac6f60f72d8735e4 4748 gcc-or1k-elf_1.0.2.tar.xz
Files:
c7f5dba64794630e583f85d17ae6c40c 1749 devel optional gcc-or1k-elf_1.0.2.dsc
23cbfa78ad38994743335e547d0aecb1 4748 devel optional gcc-or1k-elf_1.0.2.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=X0I7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: