Accepted aerc 0.10.0-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 22:58:53 +0000
Source: aerc
Architecture: source
Version: 0.10.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Go Packaging Team <team+pkg-go@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org>
Changes:
aerc (0.10.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Nilesh Patra ]
* New upstream version 0.10.0
* Remove d/p/do-not-append-ldflags.diff: Upstream adapted w/ our buildsystem
* Do not install show-ics-details.py
* Update d/gitlab-ci.yml: aerc is a leaf package and
would not break anything, use default gitlab-ci
* d/rules: Set GNUPGHOME to attempt fix build failure
.
[ Robin Jarry ]
* d/control: add build-dependency and recommends on gnupg
Checksums-Sha1:
511f760dc692273878483a8545e0ea92dcbd2b7c 3326 aerc_0.10.0-1.dsc
bc0c594125d61a61d11d1f1653df261f3c248bb5 170872 aerc_0.10.0.orig.tar.xz
0dfaea94ded9740fce3292bd15a9242171c11195 5880 aerc_0.10.0-1.debian.tar.xz
7d164eadc76e59f97636b0554a0d908cdd6c68ab 10948 aerc_0.10.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
25096ba600a0bc244e593e713d2beb9febe32e3c1e1671e93e0e408faf7c0b38 3326 aerc_0.10.0-1.dsc
20bfa806cfd6f8882e3f083332bc17e71fab9283753c92e301177f6c51c8f179 170872 aerc_0.10.0.orig.tar.xz
73956f2f58bab663eacd9ed9c25df8d9cb9c825d15273f121f12b93b07273808 5880 aerc_0.10.0-1.debian.tar.xz
9e0f79cd9320d84b0e431c366e202228cf7577399e61ba5658a68f0bab0e18b0 10948 aerc_0.10.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
fb1b98e6de78e0cfccfd6beacf3670ec 3326 mail optional aerc_0.10.0-1.dsc
0a32ccceed792fd3cbe0deec35360213 170872 mail optional aerc_0.10.0.orig.tar.xz
e08ee0dc197de975ac2c470831814f7f 5880 mail optional aerc_0.10.0-1.debian.tar.xz
261aac0b2d1206895916a5f30614d43e 10948 mail optional aerc_0.10.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=rtMh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: