Accepted rnp 0.17.0~git20220428-1 (source) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 19:54:22 -0400
Source: rnp
Architecture: source
Version: 0.17.0~git20220428-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Changed-By: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Changes:
rnp (0.17.0~git20220428-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* new experimental upstream git snapshot
* Constrain internally-reported version to something cmake and RNP can
handle (library thinks it is 0.16.999)
* added symbols:
- rnp_key_is_expired
- rnp_signature_get_key_fprint
Checksums-Sha1:
4f27b605b838de4f9028978f811fa25afe8e7482 1656 rnp_0.17.0~git20220428-1.dsc
1233812d96bd4afcf8b0a51b6fc520c486f3ab8b 2880523 rnp_0.17.0~git20220428.orig.tar.gz
10e98f4a0a92a0a61fa5050c1227db4a301a95eb 8496 rnp_0.17.0~git20220428-1.debian.tar.xz
6de1dbe12b100f4795232bd80e7e6c416d5277b6 16556 rnp_0.17.0~git20220428-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
40db049db6ad3a7b656e3774866b0ee34187fd4a6b0b5407abb2d598519e6228 1656 rnp_0.17.0~git20220428-1.dsc
eb4706119938af4d76fdcc837874f2fbe974fab0febf509d9b0b6501821e50c8 2880523 rnp_0.17.0~git20220428.orig.tar.gz
4cf2be2abe543a694c6c88c29accdb6fc6d905ca5fa7759feecd21d35d64d3f9 8496 rnp_0.17.0~git20220428-1.debian.tar.xz
7321240350a6b4394b460c004c9c679a61458e10d150be4da5829cb5d67ed65d 16556 rnp_0.17.0~git20220428-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
6940c9d4feeaf588254f3d34663fa0f3 1656 utils optional rnp_0.17.0~git20220428-1.dsc
d1ea32752875199b181391e5eaac3d38 2880523 utils optional rnp_0.17.0~git20220428.orig.tar.gz
beba083ca613688d42a427f7362e97c1 8496 utils optional rnp_0.17.0~git20220428-1.debian.tar.xz
243b5823d6b689cf5d8511d50c4b434b 16556 utils optional rnp_0.17.0~git20220428-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEARYIAB0WIQQttUkcnfDcj0MoY88+nXFzcd5WXAUCYmwa5wAKCRA+nXFzcd5W
XCmrAP0fZiHZ2+mV7S1yXjcSKe0che+YNhmC3tdtE2cVshFhRgEA4Q7z4q1W55fX
nSZiptOQoVMs3qRMq7txsqThXEgO/wg=
=yVnY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: