Accepted docknot 7.00-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 12:56:42 -0800
Source: docknot
Architecture: source
Version: 7.00-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Changed-By: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Changes:
docknot (7.00-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release.
- Various module APIs now take Path::Tiny objects instead of strings.
- Unicode should now be handled uniformly and correctly.
- Fix processing of old-style pointers in docknot spin.
- Fix import error when running docknot release.
- Fix .versions updating in docknot release.
- Process .rss files in an initial pass to avoid problems when their
output files are newly-created and Path::Iterator::Rule doesn't
re-read the directory.
- Ensure the *.tar.xz file is always regenerated if needed.
- Ensure GnuPG signatures are always regenerated.
- Copy the file modification timestamps in docknot release.
Checksums-Sha1:
4555f8b93d7a506090704d98faac8bb0c35820a0 2473 docknot_7.00-1.dsc
123e69d2bf00c11dbf06086c28326c0df6461cde 197856 docknot_7.00.orig.tar.xz
1a2705b4c0d513ab554d251abb4871e3f9610a27 488 docknot_7.00.orig.tar.xz.asc
da04d7525e9a00b41734d34463198c00214ae576 13984 docknot_7.00-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
368433c86d08286f79c2707227053a183f788f50df809c0d8690b7fa2d980662 2473 docknot_7.00-1.dsc
f3c65c7771539a283b001b07407b45eab54b403ff0b6929aca4ede1c0d71485d 197856 docknot_7.00.orig.tar.xz
d4f38902640ce23a875031ddc1eccb57f9c32cbd113fdd4d2244412081f8960e 488 docknot_7.00.orig.tar.xz.asc
d44bd4c9a1843698b3a15199f7b7a13fed118a66d3af54ecf534a2d594b398a9 13984 docknot_7.00-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
439d6a3ab5406b565e44bb25f0d3284c 2473 text optional docknot_7.00-1.dsc
5de1b3dee7992db9ff27631135a04e77 197856 text optional docknot_7.00.orig.tar.xz
8cb01896de1ef7d716305074bc016947 488 text optional docknot_7.00.orig.tar.xz.asc
86bddd91d88e51281c466ccdbeabade8 13984 text optional docknot_7.00-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE1zk0tJZ0z1zNmsJ4fYAxXFc23nUFAmHl4NMACgkQfYAxXFc2
3nUPRQgAtR4R6L5FVkVERftASCg8hduH97snri3YI58M+vykB1w48Rj3Sx2H1Boq
FoWgODan3mOJp9QUtjrH3u4riG8uDoOvQXVdmgH/ddK0AaCjV/i7URg8OA9esxbb
HTmvwzVMJWS1+KJOmvgVjYXFg6udmA8F9vYfsKWKVm89bhbaGpeFuGt8m1VrcBWw
/FsWdzligi14aI+7i/V2KWBtrJ3s3uP+YQCLAuwf/zUk+lsRm168kgt59QqvZk0k
CFW1Yb5Mhw2BhXXTK+jo0+aGuXBy74EHXNRjuoICJIijHlUmoYS/N5P7ZmRx+jXk
IiFPAmfl2VWsJIFqUQdH5Hj1+3P8xw==
=VS0W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: