Accepted linux-signed-amd64 5.15.5+2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 00:20:10 +0100
Source: linux-signed-amd64
Architecture: source
Version: 5.15.5+2
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Changes:
linux-signed-amd64 (5.15.5+2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Sign kernel from linux 5.15.5-2
.
* atlantic: Fix OOB read and write in hw_atl_utils_fw_rpc_wait
(CVE-2021-43975)
* fget: check that the fd still exists after getting a ref to it
(CVE-2021-4083)
* USB: gadget: detect too-big endpoint 0 requests (CVE-2021-39685)
* USB: gadget: zero allocate endpoint 0 buffers (CVE-2021-39685)
* [x86] Revert "drm/i915: Implement Wa_1508744258" (Closes: #1001128)
* nfsd: fix use-after-free due to delegation race (Closes: #988044)
* bpf: Fix kernel address leakage in atomic fetch
* bpf: Fix signed bounds propagation after mov32
* bpf: Make 32->64 bounds propagation slightly more robust
* bpf: Fix kernel address leakage in atomic cmpxchg's r0 aux reg
Checksums-Sha1:
04c7b8d2f6f3fd7c811112f2c9c6c6967358e235 8479 linux-signed-amd64_5.15.5+2.dsc
15a56352f0c2403a34515fb3e4062663ccc6b8e9 2757472 linux-signed-amd64_5.15.5+2.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
695c7b9dbf0019b8ddc839aed2326a539d54720977301ee3692e73ec13ae5d83 8479 linux-signed-amd64_5.15.5+2.dsc
6b071e83f31dc24c9dbfd9b713b3f8a2e0782c81dc83b861617ad29f05affd38 2757472 linux-signed-amd64_5.15.5+2.tar.xz
Files:
d4a89818e6344df9ede63654d8bb1b78 8479 kernel optional linux-signed-amd64_5.15.5+2.dsc
8033022d1c8d47c4e48baa5b1da8d700 2757472 kernel optional linux-signed-amd64_5.15.5+2.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=9pc3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: