Accepted node-strip-eof 2.0.0-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 15:03:21 +0100
Source: node-strip-eof
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers <pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Yadd <yadd@debian.org>
Changes:
node-strip-eof (2.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload
.
[ Debian Janitor ]
* Bump debhelper from old 12 to 13.
.
[ Yadd ]
* Declare compliance with policy 4.6.0
* Add "Rules-Requires-Root: no"
* Change section to javascript
* Add debian/gbp.conf
* Modernize debian/watch
* Fix filenamemangle
* Fix GitHub tags regex
* Drop dependency to nodejs
* Use dh-sequence-nodejs auto install
* New upstream version 2.0.0 (strip-eof renamed into strip-final-newline)
* Add Breaks: node-execa < 5.1.1+dfsg+~cs19.3.6~
* Add legacy module which returns new one
* Enable upstream test using tape instead of ava
Checksums-Sha1:
3937cf3543a697b2ff1fa4ceac1c196528bf864f 2102 node-strip-eof_2.0.0-1.dsc
407d376c6ee3f40c4fbbf28aa14c32153333000b 2338 node-strip-eof_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz
cf9b8fc2e4ff943f2988fb7db863a29117583a56 3696 node-strip-eof_2.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
b5fbbf494ed1d2c991d08bd4fc8e946fb5d4985358d8b3d061256c8db71ea9d6 2102 node-strip-eof_2.0.0-1.dsc
e19e6f0acda4f1bbbe2e6cb343cc2338b2c27ab54015d66ad25cc68de46d73c8 2338 node-strip-eof_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz
854732170b197a57fe6824795fd36f523b51d77c12e3c28b77ac6bd54d43e496 3696 node-strip-eof_2.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
32a80d883e4f13af80febb33774c267b 2102 javascript optional node-strip-eof_2.0.0-1.dsc
e73fc1c58973fd9a5e365e1688377c93 2338 javascript optional node-strip-eof_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz
930af29afb49a7a9335eb40d87cb91d5 3696 javascript optional node-strip-eof_2.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=DIzW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: