Accepted octave-video 2.0.1-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 11:17:16 -0300
Source: octave-video
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group <team+pkg-octave-team@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org>
Changes:
octave-video (2.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version 2.0.1
* d/p/increase-tol-videowriter-unit-test.patch: Update patch from
upstream VCS source
* d/clean: New file
* d/copyright:
+ Update copyright years
+ Accentuate my family name
* d/control:
+ Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.0 (no changes needed)
+ Set Multi-Arch: same
* d/u/metadata: Set Archive field
* d/watch: Bump to version 4 (no changes needed)
Checksums-Sha1:
a470687a7663e6b1b601441659a247e9d2b1ff24 2236 octave-video_2.0.1-1.dsc
0b85643e35278adb6164bd4a354197a4db07521a 62230 octave-video_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz
e6beda53aba5c4018920b6fc971b1611ec6d5792 4108 octave-video_2.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
69f2ece8661c15493c5b7b158d36e4733a509726ab176503b79b963180ea2cce 2236 octave-video_2.0.1-1.dsc
c3447273f850f6f86fefe15cad0a59adf364d3c377853ad9b1816436bb71638d 62230 octave-video_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz
e8ddf0e3fa70964ba25c49937a47cbf5a5384a8c12d882f6f164a783a5b4993e 4108 octave-video_2.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
b0ef633f4e0dabed31861f8b8cedb0fd 2236 math optional octave-video_2.0.1-1.dsc
9d93c56c99d2d39735ca3ac5591870ae 62230 math optional octave-video_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz
8469e76eb95eed4cbc0b54401d9bf638 4108 math optional octave-video_2.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=l5Yk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: