Accepted binutils-mingw-w64 9 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:53:16 +0200
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Architecture: source
Version: 9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org>
Changed-By: Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org>
Closes: 997661
Changes:
binutils-mingw-w64 (9) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Stephen Kitt ]
* Adjust for binutils 2.36. Closes: #997661.
* Drop obsolete patches.
* Standards-Version 4.6.0, no change required.
.
[ Debian Janitor ]
* Remove constraints unnecessary since stretch:
+ binutils-mingw-w64-i686: Drop versioned constraint on binutils-mingw-w64
in Replaces.
+ binutils-mingw-w64-i686: Drop versioned constraint on binutils-mingw-w64
in Breaks.
+ binutils-mingw-w64-x86-64: Drop versioned constraint on binutils-mingw-w64
in Replaces.
+ binutils-mingw-w64-x86-64: Drop versioned constraint on binutils-mingw-w64
in Breaks.
.
[ Konstantin Demin ]
* Upgrade to debhelper compatibility level 13.
* Include bfd-plugins in the package.
Checksums-Sha1:
ce75d08c95892b37e0f52efa1e288805fdf9fef7 1886 binutils-mingw-w64_9.dsc
326c2d3c8e9918885dbe6571044064522db3d1bd 10236 binutils-mingw-w64_9.tar.xz
852639bc9ce37ad7837c9c693e285fa8c6d36c6e 7405 binutils-mingw-w64_9_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
1b6d2ecac6887ec02d87f32339ca1479d22f5f151ab3a4d9232aeb87e25a53d0 1886 binutils-mingw-w64_9.dsc
6a253a336bda9ecf4c3eb5900db915323dc6aaa8de2e1b1200c57cb56ccbfe4e 10236 binutils-mingw-w64_9.tar.xz
8e0f3f6cc0d78e089fe06e1d4dbe55c0737f959aaefc8c7569d86f86c63d7ab2 7405 binutils-mingw-w64_9_source.buildinfo
Files:
3003fb9ab41438d9a7a2723488a31d35 1886 devel optional binutils-mingw-w64_9.dsc
244a8b4fb8476192cad7432a79ab2153 10236 devel optional binutils-mingw-w64_9.tar.xz
881e442174f134353fc9ea0fbe396c2a 7405 devel optional binutils-mingw-w64_9_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=38+F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: